Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 13175.1154979751@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2 (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm wondering about doing something similar to what
>> TransactionIdIsInProgress does, ie, make use of the PGPROC lists
>> of live subtransactions.
> Well, that sounds awfully more expensive than setting
> local-to-my-database Xmins as well as global (all databases) Xmins :-)
Only when you've got a lot of subtransactions. The point of this
discussion is to optimize for the few-or-none case. In any case,
the problem with the local/global bit was that you'd be expending
foreground-process cycles without any foreground-process return.
Being able to use a snapshot without consulting pg_subtrans will
certainly buy back some cycles...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: