Re: "all" not inclusive of "replication" in pg_hba.conf
От | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "all" not inclusive of "replication" in pg_hba.conf |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1317062826.2085.3.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "all" not inclusive of "replication" in pg_hba.conf (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: "all" not inclusive of "replication" in pg_hba.conf
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 11:58 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Rajesh Kumar Mallah > <mallah.rajesh@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear List , > > > > It is been found that the entry > > > > local all all trust > > > > does not renders below redundant in pg_hba.conf > > > > local replication replicator01 trust > > I noticed this too, and I think it should. Either way, the > documentation isn't clear on this point -- either 'all' should include > the faux replication database or it should be noted in appropriate > places that 'all' doesn't/can't do that. > "all" includes all real databases, not "virtual" one. The documentation could probably be clearer, but "all" shouldn't include the virtual "replication" database. -- Guillaume http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info http://www.dalibo.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: