Re: Missing include in be-secure-openssl.c?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Missing include in be-secure-openssl.c?
Дата
Msg-id 1316874.1635806026@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Missing include in be-secure-openssl.c?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> I would follow the practice of upstream to include both if were me
> to be consistent, but I'm also fine if you just add x509v3.h to
> be-secure-openssl.c.

Another thing that's potentially relevant here is that
be-secure-openssl.c and fe-secure-openssl.c are including
ssl-related headers in different orders.  Theoretically
that shouldn't make any difference, but ...

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression
Следующее
От: Mark Dilger
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers)