On 2019-04-06 05:03, Tom Lane wrote:
> Trying a standard pgbench test case (pgbench -M prepared -S with
> one client and an -s 10 database), it seems that the patch is about
> 0.5% slower than HEAD. Again, that's below the noise threshold,
> but it's not promising for the net effects of this patch on workloads
> that aren't specifically about large and prunable partition sets.
In my testing, I've also noticed that it seems to be slightly on the
slower side for these simple tests.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services