Re: Extra check in 9.0 exclusion constraint unintended consequences

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: Extra check in 9.0 exclusion constraint unintended consequences
Дата
Msg-id 1313087143.12350.6.camel@jdavis-ux.asterdata.local
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Extra check in 9.0 exclusion constraint unintended consequences  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Extra check in 9.0 exclusion constraint unintended consequences  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 11:58 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I'm OK with adding a note either to the 9.0 docs only (which means it
> might be missed by a 9.0 user who only looks at the current docs) or
> with adding a note to all versions mentioning the difference in
> behavior with 9.0, but I'm not really sure which way to go with it.
> Or we could just not do anything at all.  Anyone else have an opinion?

It seems to be somewhat of a burden to carry a version-specific note
indefinitely... more clutter than helpful. So I'd vote for just changing
the 9.0 docs.

Or, we could add the 9.0-specific note to 9.0 and 9.1 docs, but leave it
out of 'master'. That way it sticks around for a while but we don't have
to remember to remove it later.

Regards,Jeff Davis




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dimitri Fontaine
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Transient plans versus the SPI API
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: index-only scans