On ons, 2011-08-10 at 14:26 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> > It's come up before:
> > <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-09/msg01293.php>
>
> I was about to wonder out loud if we might be trying to hit a moving target....
I think we are dealing with a lot more moving targets than adding a new
version of SHA every 12 to 15 years.