Re: Regression failures after changing PostgreSQL blocksize
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Regression failures after changing PostgreSQL blocksize |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 131290.1770864578@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Regression failures after changing PostgreSQL blocksize (Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Regression failures after changing PostgreSQL blocksize
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres@gmail.com> writes: >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 7:19 AM Yasir <yasir.hussain.shah@gmail.com> wrote: >>> This produced so many regression failures. I'm wondering, are such failures typical/expected when altering the defaultblock size? > Our experience shows that when changing the block size, most of the regression test differences are expected — they oftenreflect output variations (like buffer counts, cost estimates, or physical storage details) rather than functional bugs. > That said, it really needs to be examined case by case. Indeed. There is relevant documentation here: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/regress-evaluation.html (Some of that looks a bit out of date, ie differences we don't really expect to happen anymore. But plan changes and row-ordering changes are definitely expected if you change any parameter that affects planner cost estimates.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: