Re: lazy vxid locks, v3
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: lazy vxid locks, v3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1312212079.29391.111.camel@jdavis обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: lazy vxid locks, v3 (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: lazy vxid locks, v3
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 08:12 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > Is the "&& LocalTransactionIdIsValid(lxid)" a guard against calling > > VirtualXactLockTableCleanup twice? Can that happen? Or is it just > > defensive coding to avoid making an additional assumption? > > lxid there is just a local variable storing the value that we > extracted from fpLocalTransactionId while holding the lock. I named > it that way just as a mnemonic for the type of value that it was, not > intending to imply that it was copied from MyProc->lxid. I know, this is the other purpose of fpLocalTransactionId that I was talking about. Is it just a guard against calling VirtualXactLockTableCleanup twice? Regards,Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: