Re: lazy vxid locks, v3

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: lazy vxid locks, v3
Дата
Msg-id 1312212079.29391.111.camel@jdavis
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: lazy vxid locks, v3  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: lazy vxid locks, v3  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 08:12 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Is the "&& LocalTransactionIdIsValid(lxid)" a guard against calling
> > VirtualXactLockTableCleanup twice? Can that happen? Or is it just
> > defensive coding to avoid making an additional assumption?
> 
> lxid there is just a local variable storing the value that we
> extracted from fpLocalTransactionId while holding the lock.  I named
> it that way just as a mnemonic for the type of value that it was, not
> intending to imply that it was copied from MyProc->lxid.

I know, this is the other purpose of fpLocalTransactionId that I was
talking about. Is it just a guard against calling
VirtualXactLockTableCleanup twice?

Regards,Jeff Davis



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Access to current database from C-language function
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgbench internal contention