Re: cheaper snapshots

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Hannu Krosing
Тема Re: cheaper snapshots
Дата
Msg-id 1311871704.3117.1577.camel@hvost
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: cheaper snapshots  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: cheaper snapshots
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 18:05 +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:

> But it is also possible, that you can get logically consistent snapshots
> by protecting only some ops. for example, if you protect only insert and
> get snapshot, then the worst that can happen is that you get a snapshot
> that is a few commits older than what youd get with full locking and it
> may well be ok for all real uses.

Thinking more of it, we should lock commit/remove_txid and get_snapshot

having a few more running backends does not make a difference, but
seeing commits in wrong order may.

this will cause contention between commit and get_snapshot, but
hopefully less than current ProcArray manipulation, as there is just one
simple C array to lock and copy.

-- 
-------
Hannu Krosing
PostgreSQL Infinite Scalability and Performance Consultant
PG Admin Book: http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Hannu Krosing
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: cheaper snapshots
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New partitioning WAS: Check constraints on partition parents only?