On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 21:23 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 17:40 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 10:58 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This patch adds support to a PostgreSQL 9.1 feature called security
> > > labels. It adds a new tab to tables, columns, aggregates, domains,
> > > foreign tables, functions, languages, sequences, types, and views
> > > dialogs, that allows one to add security label for each provider they
> > > want. I suppose most users will have only one provider, but the patch
> > > supports multi providers.
> > >
> > > Note that this does not support a recent 9.2 feature of PostgreSQL that
> > > adds security labels to global objects. This will be part of another
> > > patch.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Because of the latest push I did, it won't apply cleanly. There is one
> > small issue which will be easy to fix.
> >
>
> While working on it, I thought I would better look at the same time at
> supporting security labels for global/shared objects. So, here are two
> patches. The first one is a revised version of the previous patch. It
> fixes the apply issue, and it deals better with connections. The second
> one supports security labels for global objects.
>
>
Commited.
--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com