On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 16:32 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 18:30 +0200, Olivier LEVESQUE wrote:
> > > Guillaume,
> > >
> > > Thank you for your answer,
> > >
> > >
> > > >> Creating databases in the new cluster
> > > >> psql:/opt/pgsql/bin/pg_upgrade_dump_globals.sql:38: ERROR: directory
> > > >> "/pgqdata/pgserver01/data/tbs_ptest/PG_9.0_201008051" already in use
> > > >> as a tablespace
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > That would mean that you have a 9.0 tablespace in
> > > > the /pgqdata/pgserver01/data/tbs_ptest directory. Is it true? and IIUC
> > > > your directory layout, it shouldn't.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes, you're right. This directory was here from my last succesfull pg_upgrade.
> > >
> > > But the problem is that now, data of the new cluster is scattered
> > > across two paths which is not what I expected.
> > >
> > >
> > > > The only way is to change the code. It shouldn't be too hard, but is
> > > > potentially dangerous.
> > >
> > > Why dangerous ? It could be an option.
> > >
> >
> > I didn't mean the option is dangerous. My point is: I don't think it
> > would be interesting to add this change to the mainstream pg_upgrade
> > because the usecase is very limited (others will correct me if I'm
> > wrong), so the other option is to code it yourself. And this might be
> > dangerous (because of very limited tests, and so forth).
>
> Guillaume, I agree with your analysis.
>
Thanks :)
--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com