Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID
Дата
Msg-id 1310478598-sup-9088@alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Ответы Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID
Список pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of mar jul 12 09:34:56 -0400 2011:

> > Agreed.  On one level I like the sponsor message, but on the other
> > having "Sponsored by RedHat" on every Tom Lane item will get tiring.
> > ;-)
> >
> > Can we add text if the employer is _not_ the feature sponsor?
> 
> That would be quite unfair to those who *do* employ committers....
> Basically you'd get credit only if you didn't employ a committer.

Well, that has worked well for my case -- I haven't ever credited my
employer, only those that have specifically hired us for a particular
patch.  My employer gets a lot of "credit" in the form of email
signatures, like the one below ;-)

But I see your point and I will stick to whatever policy we come up with
(assuming we come up with one).

> This all becomes much easier if we keep the ads out of the commit
> messages, and stick to the technical side there. And find another
> venue for the other credit.

I'm open to ideas.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: per-column generic option