On fre, 2011-06-24 at 18:02 +0100, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I'm very encouraged by this - Clang is snapping at the heels of GCC
> here. I'd really like to see Clang as a better supported compiler,
We have a build farm member for Clang:
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=smew&br=HEAD
That doesn't capture the compile time issues that you described, but
several other issues that caused the builds to fail altogether have been
worked out recently, and I'd consider clang 2.9+ to be fully supported
as of PG 9.1.