Re: Discussion - Search Objects
От | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Discussion - Search Objects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1308256742.2036.19.camel@laptop обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Discussion - Search Objects (Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin.dizdarevic@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Discussion - Search Objects
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 22:31 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote: > > > 2011/6/16 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> > On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 23:48 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote: > > Yeah, I know. All of the dialogs have a "binding" to some > pgObject, > > because all of them modifies something. > > > No, see dlgFindAndReplace. > > > When I started working I had no clear picture about the > class > > hierarchy and I thought this would be an easier entry point. > I can > > change the prefix if this is wished. > > > > > Yeah, I think it would be better. > > > I'm going to change that. > > > > btw: You could help me with the factory class. Am I starting > the > > dialog correctly? > > > > > Seems good to me. My only question is: why in > frmMain.ccp and not in > frmSearchObject.cpp? I first tried the latter, and was > surprised to find > it in the former. > > I'm currently surprised myself ;) > > > > BTW, can you stop top-posting please? Thanks. > Regards. > > I'll try it. > > > One more thing: > > > Can somebody say me how to merge different patches to a single one? > I've made 3-4 commits and would like to have exactly one patch file. > It's not so important, but it would be very nice. > I suppose you're talking about "git rebase". Do a "git rebase -i" to get the interactive mode. Let the first commit the way it is. Use squash for the other commits. > Generally, I wanna thank you for your patience and help - I know this > can be frustrating to answer questions, that are clear to you since a > long time :) > No problem :) -- Guillaume http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info http://www.dalibo.com
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: