Re: Discussion - Search Objects
От | Guillaume Lelarge |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Discussion - Search Objects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1308254660.2036.7.camel@laptop обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Discussion - Search Objects (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Discussion - Search Objects
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 20:54 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Guillaume Lelarge > <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 23:48 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote: > >> Yeah, I know. All of the dialogs have a "binding" to some pgObject, > >> because all of them modifies something. > > > > No, see dlgFindAndReplace. > > Yeah, back in the early days there was some confusion about what was a > form (window) and what was a dialog - I don't want to add to that now. > > In pgAdmin virtually all of our dialogues are actually more like > regular windows because they are sizeable. That's a conscious > decision, made for reasons of usability and consistency. With that in > mind, I consider forms to be the "main" application windows, eg. > frmMain, frmQuery, frmDebugger, frmStatus and so on. Everything else > is a dialogue - a popup to perform a quick task eg. vacuum, backup or > search/replace, to adjust program options (frmOptions is one of the > mistakes!), or to define/display properties of a database object. > One of the things I want to do for 1.16 is a new options dialog. We already discussed its design. I wonder if we should also change it to a dlgOptions file. Is it OK for you? -- Guillaume http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info http://www.dalibo.com
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: