Re: Branch 1.14?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Guillaume Lelarge
Тема Re: Branch 1.14?
Дата
Msg-id 1308117473.1993.3.camel@laptop
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Branch 1.14?  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Ответы Re: Branch 1.14?  (Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin.dizdarevic@gmail.com>)
Re: Branch 1.14?  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Список pgadmin-hackers
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 23:41 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> We don't tend to remove the old code as that can lead to painful
> amounts of refactoring to make things look right afterwards. If you
> feel so inclined though, go ahead and do some cleanup.
>

I don't see why we should remove old code that still works. That we say
we don't "officially" support older versions than 8.2, that's one thing
I would understand. Working on dropping code that should work to make
sure no one can use it with older versions is something I can't
understand.

So, -1 for dropping any code, unless we have proof it contains a bug we
don't want to fix because it's on some old unsupported PostgreSQL
release.

(and when I say "-1", I really want to say "-1000000").


--
Guillaume
  http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
  http://www.dalibo.com


В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jasmin Dizdarevic
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Discussion - Search Objects
Следующее
От: Guillaume Lelarge
Дата:
Сообщение: pgAdmin III commit: Update french translation