Re: Range Types and extensions
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Range Types and extensions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1307467249.2402.175.camel@jdavis обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Range Types and extensions (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Range Types and extensions
Re: Range Types and extensions |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 11:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes: > > right. hm -- can you have multiple range type definitions for a > > particular type? > > In principle, sure, if the type has multiple useful sort orderings. Right. Additionally, you might want to use different "canonical" functions for the same subtype. > I don't immediately see any core types for which we'd bother. Agreed. > BTW, Jeff, have you worked out the implications of collations for > textual range types? Well, "it seems to work" is about as far as I've gotten. As far as the implications, I'll need to do a little more research and thinking. But I don't immediately see anything too worrisome. Regards,Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: