Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Дата
Msg-id 1306234.1600186123@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 8:48 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 8:07 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
>>> Sure. Will backporting either patch into REL_13_STABLE now interfere
>>> with RC1 release in any way?

> It is okay to skip RC1 and commit the patch/patches for 13 itself.
> Please wait until after Tom has pushed the rc1 tag. This will probably
> happen tomorrow.

I plan to tag rc1 in around six hours, ~2200UTC today, barring
trouble reports from packagers (none so far).  Feel free to push your
patch once the tag appears.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft
Следующее
От: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Дата:
Сообщение: PostgreSQL 13 RC 1 release announcement draft