Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4027: backslash escapingnotdisabled inplpgsql

Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>  Tom> Back to the point at hand: do we want to look at making plpgsql
>  Tom> respect the GUC?

> Surely what matters is the value of the GUC at the time that you did
> the CREATE FUNCTION, not the value at the time you happen to be
> calling it?

No, it isn't, and that's not the immediate problem anyway --- the
immediate problem is that plpgsql doesn't respect *any* value of
the GUC.
        regards, tom lane