Re: Sync Rep v19
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sync Rep v19 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1299329386.10703.11610.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sync Rep v19 (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Sync Rep v19
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 07:24 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > It is documented that the selection of standby from a set of similar > > priorities is indeterminate. Users don't like it, they can change it. > > That doesn't seem like a good argument to *change* the synchronous > standby once it's already set. If the order is arbitrary, why does it matter if it changes? The user has the power to specify a sequence, yet they have not done so. They are told the results are indeterminate, which is accurate. I can add the words "and may change as new standbys connect" if that helps. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: