On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 15:50 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I assumed that when Simon was talking about removing
> allow_standalone_primary, he meant making the code always behave as if
> it were turned OFF.
That is the part that is currently not fully specified, so no that is
not currently included in the patch.
That isn't double-talk for "and I will not include it".
What I mean is I'd rather have something than nothing, whatever we
decide to call it.
But the people that want it had better come up with a clear definition
of how it will actually work, covering all cases, not just "splish
splash, it kinda works and we'll let Simon will work out the rest".
-- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services