----- Original message -----
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>
> wrote:
> > On 24/02/11 14:10, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Hm, perhaps, I put it in the details, because it sounded like the place
> > to put information that is not that important, but still helpful. It's
> > kind of natural to think of the traceback as the detail of the error
> > message. But if you prefer context, I'm fine with that. You want me to
> > update the patch to put the traceback in the context?
>
> I don't see a response to this question from Peter, but I read his
> email to indicate that he was hoping you'd rework along these lines.
I can do that, but not until Monday evening.
Jan