Re: Named restore points
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Named restore points |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1297173915.1770.7791.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Named restore points (Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Named restore points
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 21:15 -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote: > > > > + else if (recoveryTarget == RECOVERY_TARGET_NAME) > > + snprintf(buffer, sizeof(buffer), > > + "%s%u\t%s\t%s named restore point % > s\n", > > + (srcfd < 0) ? "" : "\n", > > + parentTLI, > > + xlogfname, > > + recoveryStopAfter ? "after" : > "before", > > + recoveryStopNamedRestorePoint); > > > > It doesn't matter if it is after or before the restore point. > After/Before > > only make sense when we're dealing with transaction or time. > Removed. > > > > you're right Not sure I understand the comment "only make sense when we're dealing with transaction or time." Why? At present, I think the ability to stop before/after a named restore point should be put back. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: