Re: SSI and Hot Standby
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SSI and Hot Standby |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1295604054.1803.9502.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SSI and Hot Standby (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SSI and Hot Standby
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 11:19 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 21.01.2011 11:10, Simon Riggs wrote: > > So any xid that commits in a different sequence to the order in which > > the xid was assigned creates a potential for unserialization? Or? > > It's not the order in which the xid was assigned that matters, but the > order the transactions started and got their snapshots. The xids might > be assigned a lot later, after the transactions have already read data. So if a read-write transaction assigns an xid before it takes a snapshot then we'll be OK? That seems much easier to arrange than passing chunks of snapshot data backwards and forwards. Optionally. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: