On tis, 2010-12-21 at 13:20 -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:14:31PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On sön, 2010-11-14 at 04:45 +0200, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
> > > On 2010-11-12 8:25 PM +0200, I wrote:
> > > > I'm going to take some time off this weekend to get a patch with this
> > > > behaviour to the next commitfest.
> > >
> > > .. and a wild patch appears.
> > >
> > > This is almost exactly the patch from 2010-02 without
> > > CommandCounterIncrement()s. It's still a bit rough around the edges and
> > > needs some more comments, but I'm posting it here anyway.
> >
> > To pick up an earlier thread again, has any serious thought been given
> > to adapting the SQL2001/DB2 syntax instead of our own?
>
> Yes, and it's a good deal more limited and less intuitive than ours.
Less intuitive, possibly, but how is it more limited?