On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 21:20 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se> wrote:
> > What it does is gets rid of the incorrect completion which comes from
> > the completion rule for "SET foo TO bar" by adding the correct
> > completion for "SET SCHEMA" higher up in the completion function.
> >
> > So instead of an incorrect completion we get the correct one.
>
> But that's not necessarily wrong, if "foo" happens to be the name of a GUC.
Agreed, which is why I made the new rule only match
ALTER x x SET SCHEMA
while the rest will fall down and match
SET
. So I should be safe since SCHEMA is a reserved words. When I think of
it I may even have be unnecessary to require the ALTER verb.
Regards,
Andreas