Re: Tab completion for ALTER ... SET SCHEMA
От | Andreas Karlsson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Tab completion for ALTER ... SET SCHEMA |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1292639411.27475.14.camel@jansson обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Tab completion for ALTER ... SET SCHEMA (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Tab completion for ALTER ... SET SCHEMA
Re: Tab completion for ALTER ... SET SCHEMA |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 21:20 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se> wrote: > > What it does is gets rid of the incorrect completion which comes from > > the completion rule for "SET foo TO bar" by adding the correct > > completion for "SET SCHEMA" higher up in the completion function. > > > > So instead of an incorrect completion we get the correct one. > > But that's not necessarily wrong, if "foo" happens to be the name of a GUC. Agreed, which is why I made the new rule only match ALTER x x SET SCHEMA while the rest will fall down and match SET . So I should be safe since SCHEMA is a reserved words. When I think of it I may even have be unnecessary to require the ALTER verb. Regards, Andreas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: