Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren
Дата
Msg-id 1292603114-sup-3671@alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie dic 17 13:18:35 -0300 2010:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Is it possible to save the "is walsender" flag in the Backend struct?
> > That would make it possible to solve the problem very easily.
> 
> Yeah, I was wondering about that too, but the problem is that the
> postmaster doesn't know that at the time it forks the child.  The
> flag in shared memory will get set later, but it's hard to tell
> how much later.

Yeah, I arrived at the same conclusion.  I was wondering if we could
cache the result of the shared mem lookup the first time it was done,
but as you say there would still be a race condition.

> I think what we ought to be looking to do is get rid of the distinction,
> so that the postmaster treats walsenders the same as other children.

I think the problem with this is that walsenders are treated in a very
special way during shutdown -- they need to stay up until after bgwriter
is gone.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: Proposed Windows-specific change: Enable crash dumps (like core files)
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Unnecessary limit on max_standby_streaming_delay