Re: Hot Standby btree delete records and vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hot Standby btree delete records and vacuum_defer_cleanup_age |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1291881346.2872.1988.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hot Standby btree delete records and vacuum_defer_cleanup_age (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hot Standby btree delete records and vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 00:16 +0100, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 09.12.2010 00:10, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > > On 08.12.2010 16:00, Simon Riggs wrote: > >> Heikki pointed out to me that the btree delete record processing does > >> not respect vacuum_defer_cleanup_age. It should. > >> > >> Attached patch to implement that. > >> > >> Looking to commit in next few hours barring objections/suggestions, to > >> both HEAD and 9_0_STABLE, in time for next minor release. > > > > Please note that it was Noah Misch that raised this a while ago: > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-11/msg01919.php > > On closer look, that's not actually the same issue, sorry for the noise.. Heikki, this one *is* important. Will fix. Thanks for the analysis Noah. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: