is cachedFetchXid ever invalidated?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема is cachedFetchXid ever invalidated?
Дата
Msg-id 1291254516.23262.65.camel@jdavis-ux.asterdata.local
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: is cachedFetchXid ever invalidated?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: is cachedFetchXid ever invalidated?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I can't see any place that "cachedFetchXid" is ever invalidated.
Shouldn't it be invalidated before transaction ID wraparound?

It's difficult to construct a test case to show whether this is a
problem or not, but I couldn't find how this is solved in the code. My
understanding is that, before truncating the clog, we need to make sure
that there are no references to any transaction IDs that would be cut
off.

Regards,Jeff Davis



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposal: First step towards Intelligent, integrateddatabase
Следующее
От: ghatpande@vsnl.net
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposal: First step towards Intelligent, integrateddatabase