Re: Additional index entries and table sorting

On fre, 2010-11-05 at 22:33 +0000, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 28 October 2010 20:15, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
> >
> > It was already inconsistent in the SGML, but if you wish, I'll redo it so
> > that they're all in tables.  That will mean taking the sections which kept
> > index terms outside of tables already, and merging them with all the tables.
> >  Will take me a while.
>
>
> Okay, here's another version, moving index entries back from separate lists
> into function tables, although I think I've done that for more than just my
> own changes.

Committed