Re: 8.4-vintage problem in postmaster.c

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: 8.4-vintage problem in postmaster.c
Дата
Msg-id 1289830820-sup-4322@alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: 8.4-vintage problem in postmaster.c  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: 8.4-vintage problem in postmaster.c  (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of sáb nov 13 19:07:50 -0300 2010:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
> > On 11/13/2010 06:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Just looking at it, I think that the logic in canAcceptConnections got
> >> broken by somebody in 8.4, and then broken some more in 9.0: in some
> >> cases it will return an "okay to proceed" status without having checked
> >> for TOOMANY children.  Was this system possibly in PM_WAIT_BACKUP or
> >> PM_HOT_STANDBY state?  What version was actually running?
> 
> > I don't have too many details on the actual setup (working on that) but 
> > the box in question is running 8.4.2 and had no issues before the 
> > upgrade to 8.4 (ie 8.3 was reported to work fine - so a 8.4+ breakage 
> > looks plausible).
> 
> Well, this failure would certainly involve a flood of connection
> attempts, so it's possible it's a pre-existing bug that they just did
> not happen to trip over before.  But the sequence of events that I'm
> thinking about is a smart shutdown attempt (SIGTERM to postmaster)
> while an online backup is in progress, followed by a flood of
> near-simultaneous connection attempts while the backup is still active.

As far as I could gather from Stefan's description, I think this is
pretty unlikely.  It seems to me that the "too many children" error
message is very common in the 8.3 setup already, and the only reason
they have a problem on 8.4 is that it crashes instead.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: duplicate connection failure messages