Re: More then 1600 columns?
| От | Clark C. Evans |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: More then 1600 columns? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1289597138.17195.1405027223@webmail.messagingengine.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: More then 1600 columns? (Dann Corbit <DCorbit@connx.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: More then 1600 columns?
Re: More then 1600 columns? |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 21:10 +0000, "Dann Corbit" wrote: > If (for access) the single table seems simpler, then > a view can be used. Even if you "partition" the columns in the instrument over N tables, you still can't query it in a single result set. The limit is quite deep in PostgreSQL and extends to tuples, including views and in-memory query results. I find that partitioning does work, but it requires extra care on the part of the application developer that really shouldn't be necessary. Best, Clark
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: