Re: Multiple table entries?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Multiple table entries? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1288.1251052442@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Multiple table entries? (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Multiple table entries?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> But we don't use that while examining individual tuples, do we?
> We don't use the visibility map itself but we *do* use the page
> header's all visible bit. On a sequential scan we skip the visibility
> check for tuples on the page if the page header bit is set.
Urgh. I bet that's where the problem is then. Some path is failing
to clear that bit, or maybe there's a race condition that allows it
to become set incorrectly (ie right after somebody else adds a tuple).
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: