Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1287354132.12624.1.camel@jd-desktop обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 16:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > > The only major distribution that I know of that ships the deprecated > > configuration is RedHat/Fedora. I don't know when that will change. > > Red Hat switched to integer datetimes as of 8.4 ... just like upstream. > Please don't imagine that you can complain that Red Hat is behind the > curve on that. I wasn't imagining please don't get your boxers in a bunch. I was misinformed and I apologize. JD > > regards, tom lane > -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: