Re: Issues with Quorum Commit
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Issues with Quorum Commit |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1286374847.2304.101.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Issues with Quorum Commit (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Issues with Quorum Commit
Re: Issues with Quorum Commit |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 15:26 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > You're not going to get zero data loss that way. Ending the wait state does not cause data loss. It puts you at *risk* of data loss, which is a different thing entirely. If you want to avoid data loss you use N+k redundancy and get on with life, rather than sitting around waiting. Putting in a feature for people that choose k=0 seems wasteful to me, since they knowingly put themselves at risk in the first place. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: