On tis, 2010-09-21 at 17:53 +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> Sorry, I missed a bug when we create a typed table using composite
> type which has been altered.
> Perhaps, we also need to patch at transformOfType() to
> skip attributes with attisdropped.
Fixed.
> An additional question. It seems me we can remove all the attributes
> from the composite type, although CREATE TYPE prohibits to create
> a composite type without any attribute.
> What does it mean a composite type with no attribute?
> Or, do we need a restriction to prevent the last one attribute?
We need to allow the creation of zero-attribute types then; same as with
CREATE TABLE. I have fixed that now.