Re: [HACKERS] Why does logical replication launcher set application_name?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Why does logical replication launcher set application_name?
Дата
Msg-id 12850.1492533455@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Why does logical replication launcher setapplication_name?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Why does logical replication launcher setapplication_name?
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I think showing bgw_name as backend_type always sounds reasonable.  No
> need to treat external implementations differently.

That's definitely an approach we could use.  It would encourage people
to use short bgw_names, which is a constraint that wasn't especially
apparent before, but I don't think that's a bad thing.
        regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Petr Jelinek
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] some review comments on logical rep code
Следующее
От: Petr Jelinek
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker