Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1285.919622627@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> 5. Allocation of semaphores and shared memory is now based on
>> -N switch value (default or specified) rather than the MAXBACKENDS
>> constant.
> sgml and man documenation updates, right? Or should I do it?
I put something into the docs last night in the places where configure
and postmaster switches are described.
I am thinking, though, that we also ought to have FAQ entries under
headings like:
I get "IpcSemaphoreCreate: semget failed (No space left on device)"when I try to start the postmaster
I get 'Sorry, too many clients already' when trying to connect
If you like, I'll try to write up a first cut at these.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: