Re: Question about Bitmap Heap Scan/BitmapAnd
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Question about Bitmap Heap Scan/BitmapAnd |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1285.1171385353@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Question about Bitmap Heap Scan/BitmapAnd ("Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Question about Bitmap Heap Scan/BitmapAnd
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
"Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com> writes:
> What surprises me is that "parking" is in the filter and not in the
> Recheck Cond whereas it's part of the second Bitmap Index Scan of the
> Bitmap And node.
That's probably because of this:
/*
* When dealing with special or lossy operators, we will at this point
* have duplicate clauses in qpqual and bitmapqualorig. We may as well
* drop 'em from bitmapqualorig, since there's no point in making the
* tests twice.
*/
bitmapqualorig = list_difference_ptr(bitmapqualorig, qpqual);
What's not immediately clear is why the condition was in both lists to
start with. Perhaps idx_lieu_parking is a partial index with this as
its WHERE condition?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: