Re: Latches, loop and exit
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Latches, loop and exit |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1284531556.1952.4734.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Latches, loop and exit (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Latches, loop and exit
Re: Latches, loop and exit |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 10:33 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > > > Like latches, nice one. > > > > The way the loop in WalSender now happens it won't send any outstanding > > WAL if a shutdown is requested while it is waiting. > > > > That probably needs to change and we'd do similarly in other procs. > > Really? ISTM that walsender tries to send all outstanding WAL without > problems after it receives SIGUSR2. Am I missing something? For SIGUSR2, you're right. However, if the following clause is ever invoked, then the loop does have problems and we leave when not caught up. if (!PostmasterIsAlive(true))exit(1); -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: