Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process
Дата
Msg-id 1284485030-sup-1335@alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process  (Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>)
Ответы Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Markus Wanner's message of mar sep 14 12:56:59 -0400 2010:

> What bugs me a bit is that I didn't really get much feedback regarding 
> the *bgworker* portion of code. Especially as that's the part I'm most 
> interested in feedback.

I think we've had enough problems with the current design of forking a
new autovac process every once in a while, that I'd like to have them as
permanent processes instead, waiting for orders from the autovac
launcher.  From that POV, bgworkers would make sense.

I cannot promise a timely review however :-(

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bg worker: patch 1 of 6 - permanent process