On sön, 2010-09-05 at 22:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > A very similar issue is already documented here:
> > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/infoschema-triggers.html
>
> That sort of annotation was my first thought, but we'd have to repeat
> ourselves in multiple places because there are several views that are
> affected by the constraint-name issue. (Come to think of it, isn't
> triggered_update_columns also affected by the trigger-name issue?)
>
> Is that the direction we want to go, or would it be better to factor
> the information out into a separate page about compatibility gotchas?
It would probably be better to explain globally applicable issues in a
separate section.