Re: Bug / shortcoming in has_*_privilege
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug / shortcoming in has_*_privilege |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1281513444.2142.1473.camel@ebony обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug / shortcoming in has_*_privilege (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug / shortcoming in has_*_privilege
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 23:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net> wrote: > >> So there's no way to see if a particular privilege has been granted to public. ISTM 'public' should be accepted, sinceyou can't use it as a role name anyway... > > > It's a bit sticky - you could make that work for > > has_table_privilege(name, oid, text) or has_table_privilege(name, > > text, text), but what would you do about the versions whose first > > argument is an oid? > > Nothing. The only reason to use those forms is in a join against > pg_authid, and the "public" group doesn't have an entry there. ISTM this bug should be on the open items list... -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: