Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD
Дата
Msg-id 1281393719.3667.8.camel@jdavis-ux.asterdata.local
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD  (Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>)
Ответы Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD
Список pgsql-performance
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 09:49 -0700, Scott Carey wrote:
> Also, the amount of data at risk in a power loss varies between
> drives.  For Intel's drives, its a small chunk of data ( < 256K).  For
> some other drives, the cache can be over 30MB of outstanding writes.
> For some workloads this is acceptable -- not every application is
> doing financial transactions.   Not every part of the system needs to
> be on an SSD either -- the WAL, and various table spaces can all have
> different data integrity and performance requirements.

I don't think it makes sense to speak about the data integrity of a
drive in terms of the amount of data at risk, especially with a DBMS.
Depending on which 256K you lose, you might as well lose your entire
database.

That may be an exaggeration, but the point is that it's not as simple as
"this drive is only risking 256K data loss per outage".

Regards,
    Jeff Davis



В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Scott Carey
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Completely un-tuned Postgresql benchmark results: SSD vs desktop HDD
Следующее
От: Matthew Wakeling
Дата:
Сообщение: Sorted group by