Re: Surprising dead_tuple_count from pgstattuple

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: Surprising dead_tuple_count from pgstattuple
Дата
Msg-id 1281376228.2142.1232.camel@ebony
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Surprising dead_tuple_count from pgstattuple  (Gordon Shannon <gordo169@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Surprising dead_tuple_count from pgstattuple  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: Surprising dead_tuple_count from pgstattuple  (Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 16:11 -0700, Gordon Shannon wrote:

> So, I guess my real question here is, what happened to the "missing"
> 100 items?  If it was HOT prune, can anyone summarize what that does?

Itagaki already explained that the second DELETE would have removed the
100 dead rows you consider to be missing.

Any SQL statement that reads a block can do HOT pruning, if the block is
otherwise unlocked.

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: dynamically allocating chunks from shared memory
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: is syntax columname(tablename) necessary still?