Re: not null constraints, again
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: not null constraints, again |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1280408.1744650810@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: not null constraints, again (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: not null constraints, again
Re: not null constraints, again |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
The attached script simply creates two partitioned tables that are connected by a foreign key constraint, then pg_dumps that setup and tries to do a parallel restore. This works up until 14e87ffa5c543b5f30ead7413084c25f7735039f is the first bad commit commit 14e87ffa5c543b5f30ead7413084c25f7735039f Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Date: Fri Nov 8 13:28:48 2024 +0100 Add pg_constraint rows for not-null constraints Since that commit, it fails every time (for me, anyway, on a couple of different machines) with a deadlock error, typically between ALTER ADD PRIMARY KEY and one of the table COPY commands: 2025-04-14 12:54:49.892 EDT [1278062] ERROR: deadlock detected 2025-04-14 12:54:49.892 EDT [1278062] DETAIL: Process 1278062 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on relation 47164 of database47159; blocked by process 1278059. Process 1278059 waits for AccessShareLock on relation 47160 of database 47159; blocked by process 1278062. Process 1278062: ALTER TABLE ONLY public.parent1 ADD CONSTRAINT parent1_pkey PRIMARY KEY (id); Process 1278059: COPY public.c11 (id, b) FROM stdin; I stumbled across this result after wondering why the repro I'd devised at [1] didn't fail in v17. The patch I propose there seems to prevent this, but I wonder if we shouldn't look closer into why it's failing in the first place. I would not have expected that adding pg_constraint rows implies stronger locks than what ALTER ADD PRIMARY KEY was using before, and I suspect that doing so will cause more problems than just breaking parallel restore. regards, tom lane [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/2045026.1743801143@sss.pgh.pa.us psql postgres <<EOF CREATE DATABASE src; \c src CREATE TABLE parent1 ( id integer PRIMARY KEY, b text ) PARTITION BY LIST (id); CREATE TABLE c11 PARTITION OF parent1 FOR VALUES IN (1); CREATE TABLE c12 PARTITION OF parent1 FOR VALUES IN (2); CREATE TABLE parent2 ( id integer PRIMARY KEY, ref integer REFERENCES parent1, b text ) PARTITION BY LIST (id); CREATE TABLE c21 PARTITION OF parent2 FOR VALUES IN (1); CREATE TABLE c22 PARTITION OF parent2 FOR VALUES IN (2); INSERT INTO parent1 VALUES(1, 'foo'); INSERT INTO parent2 VALUES(2, 1, 'bar'); EOF pg_dump src -f src.dump -Fc createdb target pg_restore src.dump -d target -j10
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: