Re: permission inconsistency with functions
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: permission inconsistency with functions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1279911356.22066.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net обсуждение |
| Ответ на | permission inconsistency with functions ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: permission inconsistency with functions
Re: permission inconsistency with functions |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On fre, 2010-07-23 at 11:48 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > "In particular, it must have read access to all tables that you want > to > back up, so in practice you almost always have to run it as a database > superuser." > > Ignoring the fact that databases have a lot more objects than tables, > there is no READ/SELECT permission for functions. Thus in order to > backup a function, I must have EXECUTE permissions on the function. > Further if I don't have EXECUTE permissions I can still see the > function in pg_proc. In order to back up a table's contents you must read it, but you don't need to execute a function in order to back it up. It's not inconsistent, it's just different.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: