Re: Parallel safety of binary_upgrade_create_empty_extension
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Parallel safety of binary_upgrade_create_empty_extension |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 12775.1522330010@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Parallel safety of binary_upgrade_create_empty_extension (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Parallel safety of binary_upgrade_create_empty_extension
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Presumably also cursor_to_xmlschema. I also found some more
> suspicious brin and gin modifying functions. So I think the list of
> functions that needs to be marked 'u' so far is:
> * binary_upgrade_create_empty_extension
> * pg_import_system_collations
> * brin_summarize_range
> * brin_summarize_new_values
> * brin_desummarize_range
> * gin_clean_pending_list
> * cursor_to_xml
> * cursor_to_xmlschema
> Has anyone got anything else?
There are some tsquery functions that execute user-supplied queries,
and so need to be 'u' on the same grounds as the cursor_to_xml cases.
I haven't checked to be sure if they are already so, but was planning
to do so before considering this matter closed.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: