Re: Locking and postgres_fdw extension

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Locking and postgres_fdw extension
Дата
Msg-id 1277128.1605853757@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Locking and postgres_fdw extension  (Steve Baldwin <steve.baldwin@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Steve Baldwin <steve.baldwin@gmail.com> writes:
> However if I want it to fail immediately if unable to obtain the lock, it
> seems nowait is ignored for foreign tables (or at least with my version of
> postgres_fdw).

Hmm ... this seems to be intentional, per the comments in
deparseLockingClause():

                 * For now, just ignore any [NO] KEY specification, since (a)
                 * it's not clear what that means for a remote table that we
                 * don't have complete information about, and (b) it wouldn't
                 * work anyway on older remote servers.  Likewise, we don't
                 * worry about NOWAIT.

However, it's not super clear whether the concern about NOWAIT is just
that the remote server might be too old to know that keyword, or
whether there's some deeper issue.

(I see your example is also falling foul of the non-implementation
of NO KEY, which might be confusing matters still more.)

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: received immediate shutdown request caused cluster failover
Следующее
От: Dirk Mika
Дата:
Сообщение: Set COLLATE on a session level