On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 13:34 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 02:42, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 17:22 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> > "The PostgreSQL Global Development Team is proud to announce the release
> >> > of version 9.0. "
> >> >
> >> > Maybe "PostgreSQL 9.0" instead of "version 9.0"?
> >>
> >> Yeah, tried that too, it seemed repetitive. You don't think so?
> >
> > O.k. this may not fly but:
> >
> > The PostgreSQL Global Development Group (that is who we are, not team)
> > is proud to announce the release of 9.
>
> Can we please *not* call it 9, but stick to 9.0?
>
> We have enough people talking about PostgreSQL 7 and PostgreSQL 8 not
> knowing that 8.0 and 8.4 are quite significantly different products
> already. We don't need to encourage *more* of that.
Hmpf you are right. I didn't think about that aspect.
Joshua D. Drake
>
>
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering